How we work
Choosing topics and defining each page’s purpose
Before writing, we define the question the page needs to answer. A guide to the birth chart must explain the data, its components and its limits; a horoscope page must let readers choose their sign and understand how to read a general forecast; a tool must state what information it uses and what kind of result it produces.
This distinction reduces overlap between pages and makes the reader’s path clearer. Title, introduction, sections and internal links are all built around the same purpose, without piling up unrelated keywords.
Sources and fact-checking
For astronomical data, calendars, time zones and technical definitions we favour institutional documentation, recognised ephemerides and primary sources. For the history of tarot and astrology we distinguish documented reconstructions from the interpretations developed by the different schools.
When a page contains dates, percentages, correspondences or calculation rules, we check its internal consistency and units of measurement. Information that may change is reviewed; symbolic statements are presented as interpretations, not as scientifically proven facts.
Calculation and interpretation are not the same thing
The phase of the Moon, a planetary position or the ascendant come from data and calculation procedures. The meaning given to that result, on the other hand, belongs to an interpretive tradition. AstriOnLine keeps this difference visible.
A calculator can process a date, time and place; it cannot automatically turn the result into a complete truth about someone’s personality or future. That is why we accompany our tools with explanations, limits of use and links to in-depth guides.
Automated tools and artificial intelligence
Automation and artificial intelligence systems can support repetitive tasks, data organisation, drafts or recurring updates. They are not considered authors and have no personal experience or ability to verify every statement on their own.
When content is generated or updated with automated support, our editorial method requires checks on consistency, tone, limits and technical information. Interactive results remain tools for consultation: they are not diagnoses, professional advice or certain predictions.
Updates and corrections
We correct factual errors, broken links, outdated information and discrepancies between text and functionality. Substantial changes may lead to a new review of the page and its metadata.
Dynamic pages are also checked from a technical point of view: the date shown, the time zone, mobile navigation, the accessibility of controls and behaviour without JavaScript. Privacy-related reports can be sent to the address given in the Privacy Policy.
Editorial limits
We do not publish promises of healing, financial guarantees, diagnoses, threats linked to cards or transits, or invitations to give up professional help. We do not present a general horoscope as a complete individual description.
To understand the scope of use of our content, also read the Disclaimer. To learn about the project and the people behind it, visit the About us page.